THE PATTERN OF TRADE IN 17th CENTURY MUGHAL INDIA: TOWARD AN ECONOMIC GROWTH
KEYWORDS
Economy, Economic Growth in Mughal India, Trading in 17th Century Ancient Trade & Economy.
This paper identifies the absence of both sub-continentally oriented histories which knit together the land and sea trades, and convincing explanations of the persistence of the Indo-Central Asian trader (for example) despite the growing Indo-European trade from the seventeenth-century. The customs-union model usefully approximates this trading-situation (i.e. the Europeans were given a privileged trading position by the Mughals vis-a-vis the Central Asians). It is used to structure the investigation and provide suitable explanatory hypotheses, as it suggests the separation of the likely creative and divertive effects of such privileged relations. Two tradeable (and related industries) are examined. The textiles-industry demonstrates the possibility for trade-creation (i.e. due to substitution between otherwise regionally-specialized production-centers as in Gujarat, and the utilisation of spare capacity as in Bengal); it is not, however, possible to comment on the extent to which trade-creation took place. The horse-trade persisted because of limited trade-diversion. This was, in turn, the consequence of the absence of a European supply of horses, on the one hand, and the continued/unchanging geographical comparative advantage and demand conditions in the Mughal Empire, on the other. The necessary extensions to the model and analysis- for a complete understanding of sub-continental trading patterns – are noted (e.g. extending the geographical and chronological scope, investigating private trading, and introducing a balance of payments issues).
Jagjeet Lally
The author is a Research Scholar in Economic History Department of the London School of Economics. He can be reached at j.lally@st-annes.oxon.org